Diesel Whiskey Row Toro Review
Filed under: Burn Issues · Ecuador · Habano · Nicaragua · Retrohale
Verdict: Hand-Me-One (2/4). A pleasant nutty-bready-coffee smoke through two thirds that never found the sweetness I chase, then dipped into lingering bitterness and touch-up territory in the final third. Wouldn't buy it again, wouldn't turn one down — the middle stretch was a genuinely enjoyable cigar.
Whiskey Row is Diesel's collaboration with Rabbit Hole Distilling on Louisville's Whiskey Row, blended by AJ Fernandez and made at his Estelí factory: a five-year-aged Ecuadorian Habano wrapper over a Mexican San Andrés binder that spends about a year in Rabbit Hole bourbon barrels, with Nicaraguan fillers from Condega, Jalapa, and Ometepe aged five to eight years.
The Setup
- Cigar: Diesel Whiskey Row, Toro (6 x 54). Ecuadorian Habano wrapper, bourbon barrel-aged Mexican San Andrés binder, Nicaraguan fillers. Tabacalera AJ Fernandez, Estelí, Nicaragua.
- Street price: ~$8 a single online (roughly $8–10 depending on the shop; $199.75 MSRP for a box of 25).
- What I paid: $4.45 a stick — this came in a Diesel Anthology Sampler I won on CigarBid last September, nine cigars for $40. My own money, at a price that made trying the whole Diesel lineup an easy call.
- Storage: in my humidor at 69% RH since that order landed — about ten and a half months — then roughly eight hours in a travel case with a 65% pack the day of the smoke. I don't think the travel case changed anything.
- When/where: 7:25pm on a patio, clear sky, light breeze that I was mostly tucked out of. About an hour and forty-five minutes to the end.
- Weather: 77°F, feels like 79, 55% humidity.
- Food beforehand: a New York strip with salt and pepper and a baked potato with butter, about an hour and a half before.
- First cigar of the day, paired with water.
Light Up and First Third
Double cap, clean wrapper with a couple of tiny imperfections, well-packed foot. Pulling the cellophane off told me something before the first light: a yellowed cello with definite tint, so this cigar has some age on it — good or bad. Cold draw was great, sweet tobacco with more than a little tingle on the cold retrohale.
On the light, only a hint of sweetness. A little breadiness, a light nuttiness I couldn't place, and a lot of spice — not blow-your-nose-off spice, a white pepper without much bite. Not the baking spice sweetness I enjoy so much.
By the middle of the third it had improved. The spice ramped down to something borderline between white pepper and baking spice — not much sweetness or flavor to it on the retro, but it's there. Still a light nuttiness, still bready, a little sweetness now, and some coffee joining in. The burn went a little wonky early, but rotating the slow side to the bottom fixed it — I don't think it was the breeze. The draw tightened up just a little. The ash was the highlight: nice and tight with just a couple of tiny flakes.
At the end of the first third: nutty, bready, very mild sweetness — this is not a sweet-forward cigar, but the sweetness is there — maybe a hair more baking spice than before, definitely still coffee, and a little leather that lingers on the palate between draws. The ash held on great; I knocked it off to see whether losing it changed anything.
Second Third
Knocking the ash off didn't hurt a thing — if anything it improved the sweetness a touch at the start of this third. Halfway through, the burn was actually better than it had been at the beginning, though the wind had also died down, so the early waviness may have been purely wind. Flavor-wise, nothing moved: same profile as the middle of the first third, basically the exact same smoke.
Near the end of the third the ash developed a crack, so I knocked it off before it dropped and touched up a wonky burn line. The sweetness came up a touch after that — probably the fresh ash. Still a very enjoyable smoke at this point.
Final Third
A quarter inch in, the smoke went really thin — that weird feeling where it seems like it's going out but isn't. The smoke hadn't been thin the entire cigar, so I touched it up. A little past midway it almost went out again; I was doing some talking, so I'm not one hundred percent sure that one's on the cigar, but it took another touch-up.
That's where the profile dropped. Leather far more forward, coffee forward, sweetness fallen way to the back — still a touch there, but way back. The smoke thinned out in general, and a mild bitterness settled in, lingering on the palate between draws. Not horrible, but it's there, and the third definitely took a dip.
At the end, the burn went wonky on one quarter of the cigar — one side running about a quarter inch longer than the other, with basically no breeze to blame, so that's the cigar. The baking spice is gone from the retro, now just a pepper — definitely spicy without blowing my sinuses off — and no sweetness on the retro at all. The palate is leather and coffee with a little sweetness in the background. No earth anywhere in this cigar; I never got it. Rather than chase another touch-up for a tiny bit more, I let it die there. It was done.
Construction
- Wrapper: clean with a couple of tiny imperfections, double cap. The yellowed, tinted cello says this one had been sitting a while.
- Draw: great cold draw; tightened just a little in the first third and stayed workable.
- Burn: the weak spot. A little wonky early (rotation fixed it), a touch-up at the end of the second third, two more in the final third with two near-go-outs, and one side running a quarter inch long at the end. I let it go out rather than fight it further.
- Ash: nice and tight with a couple of tiny flakes; held great through the first third, cracked near the end of the second.
- Smoke output: excellent through the first two thirds — a thin, creamy texture, creamy rather than wispy. Went thin in the final third.
- Band: copper-and-slate Diesel main band with the Rabbit Hole rabbit, plus the cream Bourbon Barrel Aged foot band. Both came off clean.
Bottom Line
The middle of this cigar is where it lives: nutty, bready, coffee, a very mild sweetness, and a spice that softens from white pepper toward baking spice. If the whole cigar smoked like the back half of the first third and the second third, it'd be an easy recommendation at an $8 street price. But the blend never delivers the baking-spice sweetness the bourbon-barrel story promises, and the final third slides into forward leather, lingering bitterness, thin smoke, and a burn that needed three touch-ups before I stopped saving it. The age on this stick (that yellowed cello, plus ten-plus months in my humidor) may cut either way — I can't tell you if a fresher one does better.
Would I smoke it again? Hand-Me-One. I wouldn't spend my own money on another one at street price — the profile runs adjacent to what I want instead of at it, and the last third took the dip the first two thirds had me hoping it wouldn't. Hand me one on a patio after a steak and I'll smoke it without complaint; the first two thirds are solid company. At the $4.45 sampler price I paid, I have zero regrets — that's exactly what samplers are for.
Best for: an after-dinner smoke for someone who wants pepper, nuts, and coffee without much sweetness — and who doesn't mind putting a cigar down early when it's told you everything it has to say.
My rating scale, one question only... would I spend my own money on this again? 4 Box Buy (box on hand, always) / 3 Five-Pack (yes, a few live in the humidor) / 2 Hand-Me-One (wouldn't buy it, wouldn't turn one down) / 1 Not Even Free (I'd rather smoke nothing).
More reviews
Xikar VX2 V-Cut Cutter Review
Verdict: Buy Again... if the V-cut is your regular cut. It's solid, it's sharp, and I don't believe it's ever cracked a wrapper on me... but I've drifted back to straight cuts, and $50 is hard to justify for a once-in-a-while tool. I bought this because I wanted a proper V-cut, m
Punch Reserve Collection Robusto Review
Verdict: Five-Pack (3/4). A mild-plus, bready-sweet Robusto with a lingering baking-spice retrohale that quietly turns to black pepper — good enough that I wish I'd bought more, held back only by a burn that fought me the whole way. I've got one left and I'm glad. A solid five in
Room101 Johnny Tobacconaut 10th Anniversary (JT10) Toro Review
Verdict: Five-Pack (3/4)... the flavor is box-worthy start to finish, but a burn that needed five touch-ups and constant attention has to cost something, and this is what it costs.